Investment advisor vs stock broker

The fee-only investment advisor is a type of investment professional who charges a flat hourly rate or "a la carte" rate for his or her services, instead of taking compensation from commissions on investment transactions. The fee-only advisor 's services consist mainly of analyzing portfolios as a whole, so he or she is most likely schooled in many different asset classesas well as other areas such as real estatecollege financial aid, retirement and tax planning or preparation.

Here we take a look at the fee-only investment advisor's place in the financial world, and how this type of professional compares to those who are compensated by means of commissions.

"Stock Broker" vs "Financial Advisor"

Compensation and Efficiency A common misperception is that financial advisors provide their services for free.

Most investors give little thought to the hidden costs they pay when an advisor recommends stocks and later receives a commission when investors buy in, or when an expert mutual fund manager picks stocks for a fund that charges significant management fees or front or rear loaded payments. If you were to hire an advisor for 14 hours at that rate, you could expect him or her to accomplish a great deal of work that would produce a more balanced portfolio, returning a potentially higher rate than the loaded mutual fund.

The fee-only type of compensation provides investors with the opportunity to get more service out of the money they spend on professional advice and stock-picking expertise. Compensation and Objectivity In an ideal situation, the primary benefit of a fee-only advisor is that he or she can provide objective advice. At least in theory, these professionals are better able to look at the entire universe of stocks, bondsmutual funds and guaranteed investment certificates without being swayed by any personal benefits that may come with giving certain recommendations.

Because of the way they are compensated, fee-only advisors can be expected to practice a greater degree of objectivity. To understand how compensation and objectivity are linked, we'll take a look at the commission-based method of paying professionals and why it can lead to problems.

Broker Commissions Most investment advisors or full-service brokers work for major firms - the Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynches of the world. But these advisors are employed by their firms only nominally.

More often than not, they resemble self-employed contractors in the way their advisory services are melded into the firm's operations. Advisors employed by a firm have access to its facilities and contact with other professionals in other departments professional tradersanalysts, etc.

Also, advisors have the right to use the firm's name to market their advisory services and to assure clients that professional activities are backed by a respected firm. To receive this support from the investment firm, advisors are held to some important obligations.

The most important of these provides the firm with its revenues: The advisors' generate their income by means of commissions, the fees clients pay each time they make an investment transaction. So, it's in the best interest of both the individual advisor and the firm to generate increased revenue through maximum trading commissions. The problem with this method of compensation is that it rewards advisors for engaging their client in active tradingeven if this investing style isn't suitable for that client.

Furthermore, to increase their commissions, some brokers practice churningthe unethical practice of excessively buying and selling securities in a client's account. Churning keeps a portfolio constantly in flux, with the primary purpose of lining the advisor's pockets. Because it's based on an hourly rate, fee-only investment advice is not motivated by the frequency of your trades and is therefore more likely to encourage you to make trades when it's right for you.

However, although fee-only professionals help investors avoid the problems of churning, there should be no misunderstanding that brokerage commissions are eliminated entirely. Fee-only advisors may charge by the hour for a la carte services, but investors still need to pay a brokerage to make trades. Commissions are still the primary means by which investment firms make money, and it'll likely stay that way for the foreseeable future. The Other End of the Spectrum — Premature Self-Reliance In the great bull market of the s, there was a rise in do-it-yourself investingmade easy by technology that allowed average investors to access most of the services previously available only through an advisor or broker.

First, some investment firms began offering telephone trading systemswhereby clients could enter a trade solely by punching buttons on the phone to select their trades and amounts. Eventually the web broker, or discount brokercame on the scene, work from home jobs in shimoga stocks and other investment vehicles could be bought and sold directly with the click of a mouse.

This kind forex muslim brokers trading offered can you make money as a secret shopper commissions but did not come with the advice and guidance of the full-service brokers - giving many investors good reason and motivation to start taking charge of their own finances.

The real appeal of web-based investing was not the trading systems, but the universe of investment advice and information that became available over the Internet. Individual investors no longer had to rely exclusively on their human advisors for access to analyst research, opinions on certain investment products and specific advice on the timing of buying and selling.

Morningstar Stock, Mutual Fund, Hedge Fund, ETF Investment Research

Better still, much of this advice was available for free and wasn't based on commissions. Individual investors jumped all over the information, gobbling it up and treating it as if it were the gospel truth. Unfortunately, much of the information was anything but, and a good portion of it consisted of unfounded rumors, rampant speculation and, at its worst, outright lies.

Investors often lost a bundle as a result of being caught up in the more nefarious practices on the wild wild web. It's because of the risks of do-it-yourself investing that investment advisor vs stock broker investment professional is still relevant.

Very few average investors have the time, education, experience and inclination to achieve the same level of competence offered by many professionals. At their best, investment advisors are disciplined, committed, intelligent individuals who genuinely aim to help their clients achieve their investment objectives. So if you don't have the time or expertise to do proper research, it may be wise to seek the services of a professional. The Bottom Line The fee-only structure of compensation perhaps allows investment professionals to do well for themselves while taking their clients' best how much money does local newscasters make to heart.

These types of professionals allow investors to access professional expertise while gaining independence from compensation-based advice.

It should be noted that commissioned services may very well be the most suitable for some investors. Particularly in the case of a smaller portfolio where less active management is required, paying the occasional commission is probably not going to be the downfall of the portfolio's returns over the long-term.

Yet for anybody who has a very large portfolio to manage, whose investment objectives necessitate frequent trades and active asset allocationthe rise of the fee-only investment advisor is akin to portfolio nirvana!

If you are looking for more information about financial advisor feesInvestopedia's Ask an Advisor tackles the topic by answering one of our user questions. Dictionary Term Of The Day. A measure of what it costs an investment company to operate a mutual fund.

Latest Videos PeerStreet Offers New Way to Bet on Housing New to Buying Bitcoin? This Mistake Could Cost You Guides Stock Basics Economics Basics Options Basics Exam Prep Series 7 Exam CFA Level 1 Series 65 Exam. Sophisticated content for financial advisors around investment strategies, industry trends, and advisor education. Paying Your Investment Advisor - Fees Or Commissions?

Investment Advisor Versus Broker: How They Compare | Investopedia

By Jason Van Bergen Share. Advice For Finding The Best Advisor Broker Commissions Most investment advisors or full-service brokers work for major firms - the Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynches of the world. Are you considering hiring a fee-only financial advisor or one who is compensated via commissions?

Is working with a fee-only financial advisor always your best option? The difference between fee-only and fee-based planning can affect your financial planning success. A look at the different types of financial advisors and how their fees work when it comes to providing financial planning services to clients.

Don't think you can afford a financial advisor? Here's why you should reconsider hiring an advisor. How should you go about finding the right financial advisor? The first step is to figure out what sort of professional help you need. It's important to know how your financial advisor is compensated. Either way, what matters most is that the investor is aware of each charge and how if impacts their portfolio.

These are three ways advisors get paid. Some of them might surprise you. Financial advisors sometimes offer conflicting opinions that can be confusing for many investors. Learn how financial advisors make their money and how you can make sure they are looking out for your best interests by understanding Find out how self-employed and corporate financial advisors make a living. Find out whether they get paid based on commission An expense ratio is determined through an annual A hybrid of debt and equity financing that is typically used to finance the expansion of existing companies.

A period of time in which all factors of production and costs are variable. In the long run, firms are able to adjust all A legal agreement created by the courts between two parties who did not have a previous obligation to each other.

A macroeconomic theory to explain the cause-and-effect relationship between rising wages and rising prices, or inflation. A statistical technique used to measure and quantify the level of financial risk within a firm or investment portfolio over No thanks, I prefer not making money. Content Library Articles Terms Videos Guides Slideshows FAQs Calculators Chart Advisor Stock Analysis Stock Simulator FXtrader Exam Prep Quizzer Net Worth Calculator.

Work With Investopedia About Us Advertise With Us Write For Us Contact Us Careers. Get Free Newsletters Newsletters. All Rights Reserved Terms Of Use Privacy Policy.